For relaxation some people like to curl
up with a good book. Well, I never curl, and seldom do I relax, but I
did spend the week with a fascinating book: George Gordon's The
Pinetum published in 1858. In last week's blog I discussed Pinus
attenuata which Gordon previously named Pinus tuberculata in 1849,
and since he was a bonafide botanist I don't know why his name didn't
stick.
![]() |
Chiswick House Conservatory |
George Gordon (1807-1879) worked for
the London Horticultural Society – which later became the Royal
Horticultural Society – as Foreman of Society Gardens at Chiswick
in west London. The Chiswick garden is long gone with the Society's
replacement at Wisley, Surrey in 1904. Gordon's first edition is
described as “A synopsis of all the coniferous plants at present
known, with descriptions, history and synonymes,” and it also
promises: “One Hundred New Kinds.” Nothing explains
further about the “New Kinds,” but the implication is that these
100 had never been described (in book form) before. The title page
adds the credentials of A.L.S. after Gordon's name but I have no idea
what that stands for – certainly not Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis,
AKA Lou Gehrig's disease.
![]() |
Algernon Percy, 6th Duke of Northumberland |
The first edition was dedicated to
Algernon, Duke of Northumberland, K.G. – “a great admirer of
hardy trees, the cultivation of which in England has been much
influenced by the many fine specimens in his Grace's park and
pleasure grounds at Syon, THIS WORK is very respectfully dedicated,
by His Obedient and Humble Servant, George Gordon.” I don't
know...perhaps the Duke financed the publication.

Picea torano
Gordon followed the 1858 The Pinetum
with a “fully revised” second edition in 1875, and I'll make an
effort to acquire it to see what has been revised, what has changed.
If you check the index you'll notice a lot of double listings, for
example Abies bracteata directs you to page 145 while Picea
bracteata also directs you to page 145. Abies Torano [sic]
Siebold is on page 12 as is Abies polita Zuccarini, then Picea
polita Carriere is on page 12 but there's no listing for Picea
torano which is the accepted designation these days. What Gordon
is doing is putting all the synonyms into the index which is
cluttering and confusing.
![]() |
Abies bracteata in Santa Lucia |
Abies bracteata
Back to Picea bracteata (syn. Abies
bracteata Hooker, syn. Pinus bracteata Don, syn. Pinus venusta
Douglas), Gordon describes it: “A tall, slender tree, growing
120 feet high, but only two or three feet in diameter, first
discovered by Douglas, on the mountains along the Columbia River, and
afterwards by Dr. Coulter and Hartweg, on the sea range of Santa
Lucia...” Of course Abies bracteata has never been found along
the Columbia, but mistakes like that are what makes old books fun.
Today we know that the first known specimen was collected in the
Santa Lucias in 1831 or 1832 by either botanists Thomas Coulter or
David Douglas, probably from Cone Peak to the west of Mission San
Antonio. Both sent specimens to England, but Coulter's specimen was
first identified as bracteata and so that's why we use the
name today. Interesting that Hillier in his Manual of Trees and
Shrubs (2014) says that William Lobb introduced Abies bracteata
in 1852, so apparently that was another collection 20 years later.
Gordon sums up his description with: “It is quite hardy, but
suffers very much in its young growth from late spring frosts.”
![]() |
Tsuga mertensiana |
If you look for Tsuga mertensiana in
the index you won't find it. Instead Abies Mertensiana Lindley is
listed, which Gordon calls the “California Hemlock Spruce,” with
synonyms Abies heterophylla Rafinesque, Abies taxifolia Jeffrey,
Canadensis taxifolia Gordon, Pinus heterophylla Endlicher, Pinus
Mertensiana Bongard and Picea Mertensiana French Gardens, but I don't
know what publication is French Gardens. Gordon says of the
Hemlock Spruce: “It is found in the Oregon and Northern
California, where it constitutes one half of the timber in the
neighbourhood.” I wonder who fed Gordon that notion? He sums
up: “It is quite hardy, and very much resembles, in general
appearance, the Hemlock Spruce.” What? It resembles itself?
Today we call it the “Mountain hemlock” while its specific
epithet mertensiana refers to Karl Heinrich Mertens
(1796-1830), a German botanist who collected the first specimens
while on a Russian expedition between 1826-1829.

Tsuga mertensiana 'Bump's Blue'
![]() |
Tsuga mertensiana at Mount Baker |
One of the challenges of the book is to
figure out what species Gordon is describing, especially with Abies
Pattonii Jeffrey, or “Patton's Giant California Fir,” with
synonyms Abies gracilis Hort., Abies trigona Rafinesque, Abies
Hookeriana Murray and Picea Californica Carriere. Gordon relates: “It
is quite hardy, and has been named by Jeffrey, in compliment to Mr.
Patton, of the Cairnies, in Scotland, a gentleman much interested in
conifers.” If you google Abies Pattoniana one site gives you
Edward James Ravenscroft's The Pinetum Britannicum (1863)
where the name Abiea [sic] Hookeriana is used as a synonym. The hand
colored lithograph depicts Tsuga mertensiana, or something close to
it. Some botanists list a Tsuga mertensiana subsp. mertensiana var.
jeffreyi (Henry) Schneider, once considered a hybrid (x jeffreyi)
with Tsuga heterophylla, but never verified, so maybe the variety
is what Gordon is describing. Elsewhere he says Abies Pattonii was
“first discovered by Lewis and Clark while exploring the sources
of the Missuri River...,” and indeed T. mertensiana ranges as
far east as western Montana. Later: “Mr. Jeffrey, who again
discovered it on the Mount Baker range, in Northern California,
describes it as a noble tree...” I know of no Mount Baker range
in northern California, but Tsuga mertensiana does occur at Mount
Baker in northern Washington.
![]() |
Picea jezoensis |
Strangely the “Douglas Fir,” called
Abies Douglasii Lindley is sandwiched in the hemlock section, and so
too is Abies jezoensis Siebold which Endlicher calls Pinus Jezoensis
and Carrier calls Picea Jezoensis like we do today. As far as the
spruce is concerned, Gordon says: “Much confusion seems to exist
in books respecting this species, as to whether it is a spruce or
silver fir...” Again, I wonder how the fully revised second
edition deals with the confusion.
![]() |
Tsuga sieboldii |
![]() |
Tsuga diversifolia |


Cunninghamia lanceolata

Cunninghamia lanceolata 'Glauca'
Cunninghamia was “Named by Dr.
Brown in compliment to Mr. James Cunningham, who first discovered the
plant in China.” Followed by: “A small tree, native of
China and Japan.” Anyway Cunninghamia lanceolata is not so
small, and it is a prized timber tree in China, known as “China
fir.” Maybe the fossil record shows that it was once native to
Japan, I don't know, but in 1858 it wasn't. Later Gordon reveals that
Cunninghamia is “cultivated in Japan,” so maybe that is what he
means by “native.” Gordon calls it Cunninghamia Sinensis R.
Brown, with synonyms Cunninghamia lanceolata Van Houtte, Belis
jaculifolia Salisbury, Pinus lanceolata Lambert, Araucaria lanceolata
Hort. and others. There's even mention of 'Glauca' where “This
variety differs from the species in having its leaves on the
branchlets of a glaucous color,” which I guess is the same
clone as what I have planted in the Flora Wonder Arboretum.

Xanthocyparis nootkatensis
Gordon lists a number of Cupressus
species and calls them “The True Cypresses.” Cupressus Nutkaensis
Lambert is the “Nootka Sound Cypress,” but one synonym is
Chamaecyparis Nutkaensis Spach. It has also been known as Cupressus
Americana Trautvetter, Thuja excelsa Bongard, Thuiopsis Borealis
Fischer and Abies aromatica Rafinesque. I chuckle at the aromatica
name because, believe me, I have cut over 10,000 scions in my career
of what we now call Xanthocyparis nootkatensis and I would describe
the aroma as that of cat piss.

Thujopsis dolabrata


Calocedrus decurrens
Linnaeus named the Thuja genus, and
Gordon commonly calls it “The American Arbor Vitae,” with the
statement: “All large evergreen trees or bushes, found in North
America and California.” North America and California, I
find that amusing. When he lists Thuja gigantea Nuttall, Gordon calls
that one the “Gigantic Arbor Vitae.” Hmm...what species is he
referring to? Thuja Craigiana Jeffrey doesn't help nor does
Abies microphylla Rafinesque as synonyms. Ah! – Libocedrus
decurrens Torrey does the trick for what we now call Calocedrus
decurrens, and our common name today is “Incense cedar.” Gordon
calls it a “noble evergreen tree” and “It is found plentiful
along the banks of the Columbia River, and at Nootka Sound...”
Well, I know you won't find any at Nootka Sound especially since it
prefers drier conditions. Now the aromatic wood is used for cedar
chests and also for making pencils. The largest known tree is located
in the Umpqua National Forest in Oregon, and stands 229 feet (69.8m)
tall with nearly a 6 foot diameter. The genus name is from Greek
kalos meaning “beautiful' and cedrus meaning “cedar
tree.” Torrey's name of Libocedrus was from Greek liboi
for “tears” due to the resinous nature of the tree. Funny then
that Gordon says: “Timber, white and tough, but rather porous,
and with but little resin in it.”
Thuja menziesii Douglas is “Menzies
Arbor Vitae” with synonyms of Thuja gigantea Hooker, Thuja Lobbii
Hort., Thuja Lobbiana Hort., and fortunately Thuja plicata Lambert.
It was found by Douglas “on the North-west coast of America and
California...” Actually California became the 31st
state of the Union in 1850 but apparently Gordon didn't get the news.
Mexico had ceded California to the US in 1848 with the Treaty of
Guadalupe, back when it was a region of mission towns with a total
population of about 7,300. Not at all did the Mexican diplomats know
what gold was discovered at Sutter's Mill just nine days before they
signed the peace treaty.
![]() |
Thuja occidentalis 'Pendula' |
![]() |
Thuja occidentalis 'Smaragd' |
Linnaeus named Thuja Occidentalis, the
“American Arbor Vitae,” but surprisingly a synonym is Thuja
Siberica Linnaeus. What? It was also called Thuja Theophrasti Bauhin,
Thuja obtusa Moench, Thuja odorata Marsh and Cupressus Arbor Vitae
Targioni-Tozzetti. Gordon says that the species is “found in
most parts of North America” which is not true, although it
does have a rather large range. T. occidentalis is related to the
Thuja plicata species, though the former doesn't get as large. The
largest known specimen is only 112 feet (34 m) tall in Michigan, but
some specimens in southern Ontario, Canada have been dated over 1,650
years old, which makes them the oldest trees in Eastern North
America.

Pinus pinaster
Pinus Pinaster is the “Star” or
“Cluster Pine.” It is a species from the Mediterranean Basin, yet
it carries synonyms such as Pinus Massoniana Lambert which is native
to China. It's also named Pinus Nepalensis Royale, Pinus Japonica
Loudon, Pinus Nova-Hollandica Loddiges, Pinus Nova-Zealandica
Loddiges and more. Gordon explains: “It is also found (but no
doubt introduced from Europe) in China, Japan, New Holland, New
Zealand, and St. Helena, and even in the north of India, where Major
Madden and other travellers detected it in Nepal, and gave it the
names of P. Nepalensis and P. Latteri, but there is not the slightest
difference between the European and Asiatic plants.” So
basically Gordon is telling us that P. pinaster has been introduced
around the world.
![]() |
Pinus pinea |
As for Pinus Pinea, the “Italian
Stone Pine,” it too has travelled as some synonyms include Pinus
Maderiensis Tenore, Pinus Pinea Chinensis Knight, Pinus Americana
Hort., Pinus Sativa Bauhin and Pinus Pinea Arctica Hort. I don't
understand the Arctica epithet though since it is only hardy
to zone 8 (10 degrees F). Gordon lists some “varities” of P.
pinea, such as P. Pinea fragilis Du Hamel for the “Thin-shelled
Stone Pine” and P. Pinea Cretica Loudon from Crete “where it
attains a larger size than the common Stone Pine.”
![]() |
Sequoiadendron giganteum |
![]() |
Duke of Wellington |
I'll finish Gordon's The Pinetum
on a crabby note, for he lists Wellingtonia Lindley, “The
Mammoth Tree,” named “in compliment to the late Duke of
Wellington. A gigantic tree from California.” Gordon warns us
that “It is tolerably hardy in favourable situations, but
generally gets its foliage more or less browned in winter, and is
much injured in severe ones.” I don't know, for Oregon has more
brutal winters than anywhere in England and the “Wellingtonia”
does fine at my nursery. Synonyms include Sequoia gigantea Endlicher,
Washingtonia gigantea of the Americans, Americanus giganteus Hort.
Amer. and Taxodii sp. Douglas. The last name is odd because David
Douglas never set eyes upon Sequoiadendron giganteum. Gordon claims:
“This magnificent evergreen tree was first discovered by Douglas
in 1831...” Rong! Gordon furthermore claims that a Mammoth Tree
grows to 363 feet in height when the largest measured today is 315'
tall (95.80 m) in the Sequoia National Forest. The tallest in the
United Kingdom is 190' (58 m).
![]() |
Sequoiadendron giganteum at the Calaveras Grove |
Oh well, The Pinetum was written
only a few years after Sequoiadendron was officially discovered by
Augustus T. Dowd at the Calaveras Grove in 1852, though the first
reference to their existence occurred in 1833 in the diary of
explorer J.K. Leonard whose route would have taken him through the
Calaveras Grove. Of course Native Americans knew of the trees and
named them variously as wawona, toos-pung-ish and
hea-mi-withic. Sadly the first tree found by Dowd, christened
the “Discovery Tree,” was felled in 1853.
![]() |
Sequoyah |
![]() |
Stephan Endlicher |
Of course it was J.D. Buchholz who
argued for the separation into separate genera for Sequoia
sempervirens and Sequoiadendron giganteum in 1939. Due to Josiah
Whitneys's 1868 book The Yosemite Book it was presumed that
the Sequoia name honored the Cherokee chief Sequoyah
(1767-1843) who was famous for inventing a syllabary for his people.
A 2012 study (Gary Lowe) suggested that it was not Sequoyah
being honored, but rather the Austrian botanist Endlicher intended to
use the Latin sequi meaning “to follow” since the number
of seeds per cone fell in mathematical sequence with the four other
genera in the suborder.* Gordon was right when he claimed the Giant
Redwood to be 3,000-4,000 years old since today the oldest tree is
3,500 years old, and boy, some old-timer spent most of the day
counting rings on a felled specimen.
*However Nancy Muleady-Mecham offers
compelling evidence in 2017 that Endlicher was honoring
Sequoyah in her publication Endlicher and Sequoia:
Determination of the Etymological Origin of the Taxon Sequoia.
I had fun with Gordon's book, even
though I couldn't always figure out what species he was describing.
When quoting I stayed true to his spellings, his capitalizations and
his use of tonnes of commas which, I, found, very, annoying. At the
end of the book, after the index he writes The End, which is obvious
since nothing follows.
So what is the story with J.D. Buchholz - or was that just a tease.
ReplyDelete