 |
Linnaeus |
Besides naming nearly 8,000 plants with
his binomial system – genus then species – Linnaeus also coined
the name Homo sapiens, and he considered himself the “type”
specimen. The Latin word homo or hominis means “human
being,” while sapiens means “discerning, wise, sensible.”
Therefore Homo sapiens is a word misnomer, as most people I've
met are none of the above. Evidence of that, at least in America, is
when you consider the politicians that voters have put into office.
 |
Homo neanderthalensis |
 |
William King |
 |
Ernst Haeckel |
Related to Homo sapiens was
Homo
neanderthalensis or
Homo sapiens neanderthalensis who went
extinct about 40,000 years ago. The type specimen is Neanderthal I
found in the Neander Valley just east of Dusseldorf, Germany. That
the type specimen extended to a group – Neanderthal Man – was a
concept first proposed by the Anglo-Irish geologist William King in
1864 who thought the group was distinct enough from Homo sapiens to
warrant a separate species. King's name held priority over Ernst
Haeckel's proposal two years later (1866) to name the Neanderthal Man
Homo stupidus. See again paragraph above.
Whether you like it or not there is
evidence of interbreeding between humans and Neanderthals. DNA is
found in the genome of contemporary populations in Europe and Asia,
estimated between 1% and 6%, while it is absent from most modern
populations in Sub-Saharan Africa. Yep – we mated with the
knuckle-draggers, and it probably went both ways...i.e. your sister
did it too.
The word people is from Old
French peupel, and that from Latin populus for “a
people, nation, body of citizens; a multitude, crowd, throng.”
Populus is also the source of Spanish pueblo and
Italian popolo. I sometimes refer to the Buchholz Nursery
employees as “my people,” and though they are generally hard
working, it is obvious that I care about them more than they care
about me. With friends, if we are planning something, I'll say, “My
people will be in contact with your people,” knowing full well that
neither of us is important enough to have contact people.
 |
John Lennon |
 |
Jesus Christ |
The most famous person ever is
not necessarily the most important person ever. “We're more
popular than Jesus” was a remark made by John Lennon of The Beatles
in a 1966 interview, then he added that Christianity would end before
rock music. He also said that “Jesus was all right but his
disciples were thick and ordinary. It's them twisting it that ruins
it for me.”
 |
Napelon |
 |
Hitler |
 |
George Washington |
 |
Abraham Lincoln |
 |
King Henry VIII |
 |
Queen Victoria |
 |
Queen Elizabeth II |
 |
Isaac Newton |
 |
Steve Jobs |
 |
Charles Darwin |
 |
Leonardo da Vinci |
 |
Thomas Edison |
 |
Albert Einstein |
 |
Cai Lun |
 |
Johannes Gutenberg |
If you leave religion out of it, I
wonder what the vote would be for the most
important person
ever. Would it be Napoleon or Hitler? Is George Washington ahead of
Abraham Lincoln, or vice versa? What about Queen Victoria or
Elizabeth I of England or Henry VIII of England? Steve Jobs or
Charles Darwin or Isaac Newton? William Shakespeare or Mark Twain?
Leonardo da Vinci or Thomas Edison? Mozart or The Rolling Stones or
Beethoven? Oops – don't want to leave out Albert Einstein. Johannes Gutenberg invented the printing press, but then Cai Lun (or Ts'ai
Lun) invented modern paper in the first place (100-150 AD).
 |
William Shakespeare |
 |
Mark Twain |
 |
Beethoven |
 |
Mozart |
 |
The Rolling Stones |
 |
Vladimir Putin |
 |
Kim Jong Un |
All of these people were important or
significant, and I'm sure that many of you would champion someone
else. Ex-President Obama would probably vote for himself, but then so
would Donald Trump. Don't forget Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un.
 |
Aristotle |
I guess my choice for the most
important non-religious person is Aristotle, but I won't go into why,
not today anyway. I know that most of you don't care, and that I
should be writing about plants, not people. If that is true, I ask,
then why do most of you skip the Flora Wonder Blog text and just look
at the photos?
No comments:
Post a Comment