![]() |
Pinus contorta var. contorta |
Regular Flora Wonder Blog readers know
that at the beginning of my career I worked for an enormous wholesale
nursery – now bankrupt – that produced millions of boring trees
and shrubs. In my six years there I went from being the new grunt to
the manager of a farm that employed 110 men. To be honest I was
appointed “manager” by default. It wasn't that I was so great,
but rather that there was nobody else even half capable. But in my
tenure there I never once used a botanic name for the plants we grew,
and even the owner didn't know the botanic name of any of his plants.
It didn't matter (to him), and he made scads of money anyway and died
a multi-millionaire with a Rolls Royce in his garage. Seriously. It
wasn't until I began my own nursery that I found scientific
nomenclature to be not only important, but also interesting. For
example the conifers were mainly all Pinus at one point, then
eventually they were separated into Pinus, Abies, Picea, Pseudotsuga
etc. I became fascinated with this naming of names*, and now
botanical history has become a hobby that I will pursue until the day
I die.
*The Naming of Names
by British author Anna Pavord is an exciting adventure into botanical
history, and though ten years my senior, she is probably the first
person I would choose to spend an evening with if I could.
![]() |
Gustav Karl Wilhelm Hermann Karsten |
One of my first nomenclatural lessons
was that Picea was the generic name for “spruce” and Abies
was for the “true” firs. To the general public they surely appear
to be about the same – upright, evergreen trees that produce cones
that are often full of sticky pitch. But of course the cones are
erect on the branches of the firs, while the Picea cones are erect at
first but then drop downward as they mature (I'm tempted, but wont
make a joke here). And anybody who works with Picea and Abies knows
that the former has prickly needles while the latter are more soft
(again, no jokes). But at first I was confused. Let's see: Picea is
spruce and Abies is fir...then what the hell is Picea
abies? What a confusing name for the common “Norway spruce!”
We can blame Linnaeus/Karsten for the problematic name. You all know
about Linnaeus, but I'll tell you a little about Karsten – Gustav
Karl Wilhelm Hermann Karsten (1817-1908), but why so many names? He
was a German botanist and geologist who followed my hero, Alexander
von Humboldt, and traveled in Venezuela, Ecuador and Colombia from
1844 to 1856, and later served as professor of plant physiology at
the University of Vienna. As follower of Linnaeus he was the binomial
author of many botanic species.
Last week's Flora Wonder Blog, The
Allure of Lore, suggested that the more you know about the
scientific name of a plant, the more you can appreciate it, and that
no diminishment to its “magic” need occur. After all, the
haughty botanists who bestowed most of the generic and specific names (after the Linnaeus binomial system) were allowed the award of
“first name sticks” no matter how dumb or wrong it might seem to
us today. Thus we have Acer pensylvanicum spelled rong – but too
late – and Scilla peruviana that doesn't come from Peru.
![]() |
Abies lasiocarpa |
I'll admit that the botanic names are
sometimes rather petty, or at least to me. We learned last week that
Abies lasiocarpa was named for its hairy cone scales. If I looked at
the fir for every day of my life I would never distinguish it for its
hairy scales. On the other hand, the next time I see a cone I
will certainly check the scales, and hopefully I will be with someone
so I can boast of my botanic knowledge.
For the past few years we have been
keeping track of the species of rootstock used as understock for our
Abies grafts. Prior to that I could only tell you what we used for
the current season, not what the rootstock might have been ten years
ago. The choices could have been A. koreana, A. firma, A. balsamea or
A. balsamea var. phanerolepis. To a customer in the humid southeast
USA, he would be happy to know that the A. firma was the rootstock,
and for someone in Oregon he probably wouldn't care. This past winter
the majority of our grafts was on A. balsamea var. phanerolepis,
commonly known as “Canaan fir.” It is native to isolated pockets
in the mountains of Virginia and West Virginia, and the common name
comes from one location in the Canaan Valley northeast of Elkins,
West Virginia. For you heathens in the readership, Canaan was a
Semitic-speaking region in the ancient Near East that corresponds to
modern-day Israel, Palestine and Jordan. Phanerolepis is
derived from Greek phaner or phanero for “visible”
or “manifest,” and lepis meaning “scale.” Therefore
you have a fir with conspicuous bracts unlike the hairy cones of A.
lasiocarpa mentioned previously.
![]() |
Corydalis flexuosa 'Blue Panda' |
![]() |
Reuben Hatch |
Let's take a look at some other plant
names and see what we can learn. Last week we sold out of our crop of
Corydalis flexuosa 'Blue Panda'. It was collected in China and named
by my “grandfather” Reuben Hatch about 30 years ago. Later it was
patented by Terra Nova Nursery of Oregon but it should not
have been because 1) it was collected in the wild and 2) it had been
sold under the 'Blue Panda' name for about five years prior to the
patent. The specific name of flexuosa is a guess and I'm not
sure if that was ever proven for certain. Flexuosa does not
mean “flexible” in the botanic sense, rather it means “full of
bends” in Latin. A few other flexuosa species include Agonis
flexuosa (a tree species), Grevillea flexuosa (a shrub species),
Deschampsia flexuosa (a bunch grass species), Scutellastra flexuosa
(a sea snail) and others. I don't know what is so “bendful” with
the Corydalis – the foliage or flower?
![]() |
Corydalis scouleri |
![]() |
John Scouler |
![]() |
Corylopsis glaucophylla |
![]() |
Corylopsis spicata 'Golden Spring' |
The entry following Corydalis on the
Buchholz Master Plant List is Corylopsis, and the genus is commonly
known as the “winter hazel.” That's obvious because the generic
name comes from corylus for “hazel” and the Latin suffix
opsis meaning “resembling.” Generally speaking I don't
like naming plants for other plants that they resemble, and I think
that the botanical namers should have been more original. Besides,
Corylopsis is in the Hamamelaceae family and Corylus is in the
Betulaceae family. Corylopsis spicata (Latin for “spiked”) is a
species with the attractive cultivar 'Golden Spring' and it is the
only winter hazel we currently propagate. I have a number of other
species in the collection but they didn't sell very well. The
nomenclature is murky for Corylopsis anyway, or at least it was for
me. One species had beautiful foliage and was called glaucophylla
by the now defunct Heronswood Nursery, but I've never seen it listed
before or after I acquired my plant 15 years ago. Could it have been
that glaucophylla was a cultivar name? If so it is an
illegitimate name.
We have never sold Crocus at Buchholz
Nursery, however the genus is no stranger to the Flora Wonder
Arboretum. It is a member of the iris family which develops from
corms and I am delighted to know that the plural of Crocus is
Croci, pronounced as krō-kē.
There are about 75 species native to the Alps, southern Europe and
the Mediterranean and they perform spectacularly in Oregon...well, if
you can keep the damn squirrels away from them. Crocus is the saffron
plant and the name is from Greek krokos which is of Semitic
origin, from the Akkadian* kurkanu for saffron. In particular
I like Crocus sieberi, a late-winter bloomer also known as the “snow
crocus.” The species is named for Franz Sieber (1789-1844), a
botanist and collector from Prague who traveled to the Middle East,
South Africa and Australia. In his later life Sieber went loony and
wound up in the Prague insane asylum where he spent his final
fourteen years, but don't blame the Croci for his dementia.
![]() |
Bronze Head of an Akkadian Ruler |
What's the skinny on the variegated
“Horse chestnut,” Aesculus hippocastanum 'Wisselink'? I first saw
the cultivar at the Bellevue Botanic Garden near Seattle, then again
at Sebright Gardens, Oregon, where a magnificent specimen was
displayed. The foliage on the cultivar was nearly white (in spring)
with enough green in the leaf veins to keep the selection from
burning horribly in summer. Thomas Johnson of Sebright told me that
his tree came from Lucile at Whitman Farms, Oregon. I begged one from
Lucile and the other day we picked up our tree, but it was labeled A.
h. 'Variegata'. So...I'm wondering if I have the real 'W.'?
![]() |
Irina Boboshko |
![]() |
Vladimir Horowitz |
The genus Cotoneaster is a useful small
tree or shrub in the rose family, and the gardener (and his birds)
is/are rewarded with glossy yellow-to-orange-to-red fruits in autumn
and early winter. Oddly, the generic name is from Latin cotoneum
for “quince” and aster which denotes “incomplete
resemblance,” which implies that it is a plant that resembles a
quince, but not quite. “Quince,” or Chaenomeles is a genus
of shrubs also in the rose (Rosaceae) family. The generic name
Chaenomeles is from New Latin chaemo, and that from
Greek chainein and Greek meles for “apple” or
“fruit.” Apple is generically Malus – not as in “Malice
for None,” and also nothing bad – but rather a genus in the
Rosaceae family distinguished by fruit without grit cells. Malus
is derived from Latin malum for “apple,” and that from
Doric Greek malon. If you were paying attention in high school
or freshman college, you would know that “Doric” or “Dorian”
was an ancient Greek dialect, and not just a type of
architecturally-vertical column. I am particularly enamored with
Cotoneaster frigidus which is native to the Himalaya, and I guess it
was named because of its origin to a cold place? Frigidus is
Latin from frigere “to be cold,” similar to Latin frigus
for “frost,” and that from Greek rhigos. Anyway C.
frigidus is a “tree” Cotoneaster, so give it plenty of room in
the garden.
If you want to attract hummingbirds you
can do no better than grow a specimen of Caesalpinia gilliesii, the
“bird of paradise” with yellow flowers and red filaments. This
bush/tree is native to Argentina and Uruguay and some list it as
hardy to USDA zone 6. Plant Delights Nursery reports that one
survives at the Denver Botanic Garden, but PD rates it as zone 7a.
Not only are the flowers very showy, but Caesalpinia is friendly to
other plants. The genus has a symbiotic relationship with some soil
bacteria, and nodules develop on the roots which provide nitrogen for
other plants growing nearby. Caesalpinia was named for the Italian
botanist Andrea Cesalpino (1519-1603), and it was bestowed by the
Franciscan monk Charles Plumier. Linnaeus retained the name in his
system and praised his predecessor with the following: Quisquis
hic exstiterit primos concedat honores Casalpine Tibi primaque certa
dabit.* Linnaeus honors the Scottish naval surgeon and botanist
John Gillies (1792-1834) with the specific name. He was a wimp
however, and suffered from poor health and died at age 42 in
Edinburgh. While in South America he endured wars and civil unrest
along with his chronic ill health, but he was able to send numerous
plants to Hooker at the RBG Kew.
*Basically, Cesalpino was the best.
Botanical nomenclature and its history
is fascinating, and if I haven't convinced you of that it's the fault
of my presentation rather than the subject matter itself. Were we
“Wandering Through Nomenclature,” or “Rambling Through
Nomenclature?” – you can decide. The word nomenclature is
derived from Latin nomen for “name” and calare
meaning “to call.” Botanical nomenclature is really a means of
communication, a way of mapping our natural world in a shared
language. With this tool I can speak to Icelanders, South Americans
and Asian about our earthian floral experience, and we can all learn
from each other. My life has been a plebeian grind, and growing
plants has not been an easy or secure way to feed my family, but
along the way I have found happiness and satisfaction, and thank you
Flora for your bountiful gifts.
No comments:
Post a Comment